August 20, 2019
August 12, 2019
Impeccable speech first requires impeccable listening.
July 20, 2019
Freedom From the Craving Mind

I’m currently on my sixth day of a water fast. In addition to the freedom from arthritis pain due to my reduced weight, there’s huge freedom from not craving food. I’m not advocating fasting without thorough knowledge of how to go about it. It’s serious deprivation that can kill you if you don’t know what you’re doing. Yet, there’s a huge reason it’s part of many spiritual traditions. When we’re deprived of something essential we build gratitude for it. Having the experience of no shelter, no food, or reduced safety, we come to better appreciate the blessings of food, shelter and safety. If we haven’t known ‘not having’ we tend to take things for granted. As a child, I don’t think I can recall going to bed with hunger in my belly. I always had shelter and in the ’50’s, things felt safe and stable. When I was twelve I had a farm accident that had me in a wheel chair for three months and crutches for nine months. I no longer took mobility for granted and craved the day I could play outside again. I never lost shelter, but the Cuban Missile Crisis happened that fall and the sense of safety was gone. We had routine drills where authorities tried to comfort us with drills that were somehow supposed to protect us from a nuclear bomb. It seemed like everyday we heard slogans against the Russians and replays of Kruschev’s statement that he would bury us. I took my shelter for granted, didn’t worry about food even though we had to have milk mush often because the bank account was overdrawn. I obsessed over walking again and the Russians killing us.
In the ’50’s and ’60’s things seemed much simpler. Advertising technique was pretty basic and often consisted of adult products I didn’t understand. They hadn’t gotten to my craving mind. I was a devote religious child and didn’t question authority. I felt at peace with my relationship to Jesus and had fear instilled in me to follow the teachings or risk going to hell. I had no idea of climate change, environmental concerns, technology or a global economy. Military jets frequently broke the sound barrier over our dairy farm and I remember intense craving to one day fly one of those jets.
My knee surgeon picked up on my intense desire to one way walk normal again. I’ll never forget the day his sparkling blue eyes pierced my soul. The exercises I had to do were excruciating and caused tears every time I did them. I had a limp and he transmitted with a loving firm heart, “Randy, if you ever want to walk again and play sport again, you have to do these exercises without excuse.” From that point on, I’ve not taken my knee for granted and recognized the gift of the body and the need for my participation in it’s healing. The sense of stewardship to the body was the gift of my injury. The early life of poverty on a small dairy farm carried an appreciation for having and for not taking things for granted. The faith from my Lutheran religion and my mother gave me a solid sense of being supported, feeding a courage to be a pilgrim without fear.
The relationship of intention, deprivation, not taking things for granted and the craving mind seems central to a successful life. Perhaps one of the greatest liabilities to our material prosperity and more secular craving mind is our failure to practice gratitude for what we have. We used to get propaganda advertising telling us our life would be better “if we bought what they sold”. They went further and aimed to convince us that we couldn’t be happy without buying what they sold. Some religions applied this with their approach to missionary work. Some politicians applied this to their approach to foreign relations. Our minds craved for people to be “like us”. The simplicity and wisdom from my father and his small dairy farm was evaporating as the American mantra seemed to be “bigger is better and more is necessary”.
I look at this today and witness the supposed winners of this mantra and cry “ants in a sugar bowl”. Whether for money or power, we’ve ended up with a bunch of ants bloating themselves in the sugar bowel failing to see the wisdom in moderation and the gifts that come from conscious deprivation. I’m much more willing to listen to someone who knows the experience of deprived food, shelter and safety than someone who has mainly known the having experience. I’m much more willing to listen to someone who has also been a pilgrim, having the experience of the minority of race, nationality, religion, and sexual orientation. I definitely want to know about their experiences with oppression and injustice.
Real freedom comes when we can escape the craving mind, even in those situations where food, shelter and safety may be deprived. If I’m voting for a representative in politics or religion, I want to know how free they are from the craving mind. If they don’t know the freedom and faith that comes from ‘not having’, how could I ever expect them to understand and meet those in deep suffering. If our aim is to not cause harm and hopefully meet those in need and suffering, it seems foolish to put our trust in those who have no experience in deprivation.
It seems we can continue to grow our material craving and secular worship, honoring those with most power and/or wealth, or we can move from a nationalist power thirst to true patriotism, finding freedom from the craving mind in philanthropy, charity, and aiming to give priorities to feeding, sheltering and providing safety to those who’ve lost it. Rather than worshipping the gross hoarding of our ever increasing billionaires, it’s now time to recognize that we’re all in the same boat. We need interviews with the ants in the sugar bowel so they can come to see the absurdity of their wealth and greed. We need to meet them with our hearts rather than through shame. We need to move away from any sense that they are some how the ‘winners’ of the monopoly game we played as children. We need to explore deeply how they have come to understand the various depths of experience that come from ‘not having’. We need to find ways for our economy to once again find a moral conscience that recognizes how we all are in the same boat. We need religions and governments that always ask ‘who gets hurt’ with any policy or belief before implementing special interest agendas without regard to collateral damage. We need to place our greater emphasis on diplomacy departments over military budgets that deplete our capacity to function as a democracy. We need to make America kind again.
June 24, 2019
Enabling Being to Emerge From Non-Being
In 1968 I read the following from R.D. Laing’s book Politics of Experience:

“Man most fundamentally, is not engaged in the discovery of what is there, not in production nor even in communication, nor in invention. He is enabling being to emerge from nonbeing. The experience of being the actual medium for a continual process of creation takes one past all depression or persecution or vain glory, past, even chaos or emptiness, into the very mystery of that continual flip of nonbeing into being, and can be the occasion of that great liberation when one makes the transition from being afraid of nothing to the realization there is nothing to fear. Nevertheless, it is very easy to lose one’s way at any stage, and especially when one is nearest. Here can be great joy, but it is as easy to be mangled by the process as to swing with it. It will require an act of imagination from those who do not know from their own experience what hell this borderland between being and nonbeing can become. But that is what imagination is for. One’s posture or stance in relation to the act or process can become decisive from the point of view of madness or sanity.” p42
These words were transformative and were perhaps my first introduction to the zone of “no-thing”, the silence of silences, the ground of groundlessness. Stacy Paralta seems to be speaking to this in the following audio clip.
“True sanity entails in one way or another the dissolution of the normal ego, that false self competently adjusted to our alienated social reality; the emergence of the “inner” archetypal mediators of divine power, and through this death a rebirth, and the eventual re-establishment of a new kind of ego-functioning, the ego now being the servant of the divine, no longer its betrayer.” p. 144 The Politics of Experience by R.D. Laing
May 25, 2019
Balance/Awareness Practice
More commentary from Stacy Paralta interview.

May 24, 2019
Becoming Nobody…the stilled mind
Earlier this year I had the honor to interview Stacy Paralta. We have shared the Pacific waters kitesurfing and his movies (‘Dogtown and Z-Boys’, ‘Bones Brigade’, ‘Riding Giants’ to name a few) have inspired me. We both have meditation, yoga and boardsport practices and Stacy has perhaps interviewed, coached and ridden with more world class boardsport athletes than anyone I know. We share a mutual passion in understanding that moment of the ‘witness mind’ that steps free from the boundaries of space/time concepts. Here’s a clip from our March interview where he describes this experience in his movie making and a nineteen year old’s skateboard experience when Stacy was recognized as one of the world’s top skateboarders.

May 19, 2019
May 17, 2019
How Deep Is Our Commitment to Not Cause Harm? That’s Where Peace Lies

We have a mother robin nesting just outside our front door. As she nurtures her babies, she comes to a deeper sense of trust. She can smell our desire to ‘not harm’ her nest. Now, after a couple weeks, we can make a large commotion nearby and she’ll confidently stay in her nest. Dr. Martin Luther King once said that our enemy can smell our contempt for them, even when their words communicate a sense of agreement. When we lose that commitment to ‘not harm’ we miss an opportunity to build trust. So how can we apply this to our politics today?
We’ve moved to bigger circles of belonging as global commerce, technology and climate change have shown us the necessity to communicate with all our fellow humans. Our failure to gain their trust through our commitment to ‘not harm’ results in an escalation of their fears and consequent violence. When we fail to place collateral damage from war as a top priority in our attempts to participate in a less violent world, we escalate the violence. When our fellow humans lose trust in America’s foreign policy we increase the danger to ourselves. Similarly, when they can smell our sincere desire for the welfare of their citizens, our commitment to not harm them through air and water pollution, to protect all humans through concerns to not harm animal and plant life, to protect the ozone layer, and to pledge a zero tolerance for collateral damages caused from military intervention, we’ll make a huge move to the trust the mother robin has come to show us.
Our current Draconian approaches to foreign policies only serve to diminish the trust others have in America. Simply put, war doesn’t work anymore (as if it ever has). Once it became impossible to identify the enemy, once we slackened our commitment to ‘not harm’, once we let the fighting cancer of harm infiltrate our own executive, legislature and judicial branches, we lost the trust of the people. Is there a remedy? How do we begin to build a bridge to trust?
I suggest we all begin our day with a new Pledge of Allegiance. Can we hold to a commitment to at least start the day or meeting or class with the pledge, “We all here aim to not cause harm. We will seal this commitment to respect one another with a few minutes of silence, where we all breath in the same air, say ‘Yes’ to the stewardship of one another and planet, and ‘Thank you’ to that which is bigger than us for the opportunity to participate in this wonderful gift of life.” We will then break this silence with the humble statement of, “I affirm that I don’t know everything. I affirm that I don’t have ALL the information. I affirm that my thinking is only a map from my experience that partially reflects the territory. My willingness to listen to your map affirms my willingness to build trust, just as my refusal to listen affirms my lack of willingness to build trust, to set ‘no harm’ as a primary moral obligation.
Just as any game requires players to agree on rules of play, this rule of play would go a long way for building trust amongst our fellow humans. Our failure to commit to intentions of ‘no harm’ fed through fear and greed often leaves us with actions and thoughts the animals are confused by. It’s careless behavior in a time where everything is showing to be more and more fragile.
You must be logged in to post a comment.